to shreds

Dean’s son


Share

Tags: dorothy, jocelyne

146 thoughts on “Dean’s son

  1. This can only go well.

    1. i get that dorothy knows carla technically (altho idk if carla would rly consider her a friend or anything/care much for her) but i wouldn’t be surprised if carla ended up being hounded by multipple ppl who knew who her parents are (if anything i’m surprised we haven’t seen radaih trying to suck up to her)

      1. Raidah most likely sees her as a liability.

        1. i mean, not that carla would play along either way but i’d think she’d consider carla more ‘useful’ than walky

        2. Likely happened already. I think they are both a year ahead of the others

        3. raidah would have tried ages ago and got shot down so hard and fast the crater is still smoking two years later

        4. there’s the other, more awful possibility. that Raidah weighed Carla’s “transness” against her use as a future ally and decided that she wasn’t worth courting.

      2. I dunno, Carla wants revenge on the police who invaded her room and vandalized her stuff because they stormed the residence hall because of this protest (in the end). I could see her using this an an opportunity to get back at them.

        1. Will the machinations of her revenge be cold, swift, and absolutely ridiculous? I’d like to see Carla pranking the cops.

          But more so, I’d like to see Carla taking all this Ruttech-supporting-war-stuff seriously, which I THINK she will, considering Charlie took issue with it. I’m not sure if Carla cares tons about the opinions of others, but I think she cares a lot about Charlie’s opinions.

        2. Thing is, revenge can leave you in two very different states. And if they try to use Carla for their agenda, the mood she’s in now? It could leave her broken.

        3. I think Joseph Edgar Foreman aka Afroman got the best revenge on cops. He used video footage from his own security cameras to make fun of them (Lemon Pound Cake).

          Then the cops tried to sue, and that made them only more ridiculous, and Afroman won the lawsuit. That made the cops even more ridiculous and relaunched Afroman’s career.

    2. You never know. Though “exploitable humanity” isn’t a phrase I’m overly fond of.

      Given that Carla wasn’t persuaded to approach her parents about it by the love of her life, I’m not sure how persuasive Dorothy would be. But tipping points and all that.

      1. That “exploitable humanity” line sounds like something Raidah would say.

  2. Carla’s Gun. She stole it from Chekhov.

    She made it so it shoots a little flag that says “bang” now, instead of bullets.

    1. It somehow does double damage that way.

      1. That’s because very few things are resistant to psychic damage. It turns out most people are actually resistant to piercing damage, and thus take half damage to bullets, we just tend to have so few hit points and guns have such a high damage die that even half damage is usually more than enough, short of a really low roll.

    2. Still at 1200 m/s muzzle velocity, so the flag unfurls out the backside of the target – but now the lethal force is also comedy. It’s for ha-ha-homicide.

      1. The Joker meets Casino Royale (1967)?

        1. I’m almost certain I’ve seen someone (in animation) do the ‘”Bang”-flag pops out” gag, but the weapon specifically had a two-stage trigger. half-pull unfurls the flag, and a full pull launches the flag with lethal velocity.

        2. That sounds like something that happens in Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker.

    3. that TV box was so large for me…

    4. I appreciate the literary concept of the Check-Offs List, where you make a list of every single background detail and then as the demonstrate plot importance later on, you check them off the list. Obviously you must check off the entire list or the work cannot end.

  3. At some point Jocelyne’s gonna figure out the entire plot is contained within her sister’s dormitory floor. It’s a one-stop shop.

    1. Wait is this going to be like the ST:TNG episode where the whole universe shrinks down to just the Enterprise?

      1. The universe is a spheroid region 705 meters in diameter.

      2. Love that episode.
        Or any episode where Gates McFadden gets to stretch her acting chops.

        1. Seconded. For example (and I’ve said this before), she has an excellent, very human and entirely non-verbal reaction to the above line: she almost swoons for a moment (oh fuck me) and then locks it firmly back down (no, no, we are not doing this now – work the problem, save the patient, come apart later).

  4. I like the self-awareness from Dorothy in panel 2.

  5. I’m suddenly getting vibes Jocelyne is actually in charge of this. Don’t trust Jocelyne on the principle of it, but also if she’s actually organizing these protests good for her.

    1. I’m much more prone to take “don’t trust Tony” away from this situation than “don’t trust Jocelyne”.

    2. If it’s true, Jocelyne was the main character all the time :O

      1. Jocelyne is conspicuously the only writer within the cast, so if anyone within the story wrote it, it would be her XD

    3. Jocelyne saying she leaves the thinking for smarter people but is actually the leader of all this… I see what you’re putting down.

      1. These just don’t sound like the questions of someone just doing what she’s told and leaving the thinking to the smarter people. But that’s a lot to assume from a few words.

        1. I think it might also be a little bit giving an impression of being open/willing to manipulate/exploit others for their gain. Like. For the cause, sure thing.. and for sure it’s a good cause. But the “using someone” angle to get there never gives great vibes.

        2. It could simply be that she’s asking questions and reporting back to the folks she referenced in the previous comic. Getting intel is good. The musing on angles, though, does seem to contradict the statement about leaving the thinking to other people.

          I also think it’s a bit unnerving the way she’s talking so easily about exploiting people, personally. I get seeking allies, but talking about it the way she is, it sounds like she considers them expendable if they get caught.

        3. “Get caught” on what? Talking to their parents?

    4. The “leave it up to smarter people” line from yesterday felt pretty standard as far as ways white progressives activists might try to be intentional about avoiding moving into a new movement they’ve just ‘discovered’ and clumsily taking over aka ignoring the already existing organization of movements created by marginalized groups who have been impacted by “the cause” that the white person is new to for a long time already.

      IMO Jocelyn just phrased it in a self depreciating and maybe awkward way. But to me it sounds like Willis took note of discourse other real political movements had irl and online in the last few years as opposed to Jocelyn being Sinister.

  6. “2/5 Steps complete”
    *World of Warcraft quest update sound*

  7. To shreds, you say…

    1. And their wife?

      1. To shreds, you say. Tsk tsk.

        1. Good News, Everyone! There’s a new dorm room open.

  8. Been waiting years for Jocelyne to interact with Carla, crossing my fingers this isn’t a fakeout

    1. But will they use the secret passcodes?

  9. Joyce is gonna fuck carla to get an in. It’s the only way

    1. isn’t carla ace? She’s also dating charlie as well, tho idk if it’d work if charlie and booster were to try to convince her to have a proper talk with her parents

      1. Carla is ace – and sex-repulsed even, so she’s not going to fuck for any reason.
         
        “You, go in there and do gross things to your girlfriend right now!” Or something like that.

  10. Trying to convince Carla to influence her parents seems reasonable.

    Trying to convince Tony, in the hopes he can convince his dad the dean, in the hopes the dean can convince the board (who actually controls the budget) to divest from a company, in the hopes that losing one university would change the companies actions regarding Bulmeria. Seems like too many degrees of separation from actual decision makers

    Though this comic does seem to talk like the dean would be the one to make that call? And like losing the university connection would be majorly impact full to Ruttech? So maybe thats how it works in universe?

    1. Leaving aside the social dynamics of the relationships, I think Tony has more actual tangible power in the situation. For him it’s not just child to parent, it’s also Star Player, and the various people in power including pops likely really don’t want him sitting out in protest (though I’m sure there are political situations where they would see that as a gain, such as to appease warhawks).
       
      Though Mr. Dean definitely gives the impression of an authoritarian hardass and Tony might not have much practice at standing up to him. Carla’s parents seem nicer but it’s unclear if that’s a niceness that involves listening to her input

      1. Star player, or just… player?
         
        (Mind you, at the time Willis started this comic, the idea of a “Star Player” at Indiana was frankly laughable, and now they’re National Champions)

      2. idk how strict the dean was with tony before but i can imagine at the beginning of the year or so him telling tony to not make any public statements about anything in interviews/social media or so or overall telling ppl after roz’s sex tape leaked

      3. Okay but …. so? Like let’s play this out. Let’s say that Tony does have enough pull to get the university to divedt from Ruttech.

        Divesting means selling the stock they hold, which they would sell to some other party. Which unless the university has somehow accumulated a significant percentage of the company, Ruttech wouldnt even notice.

        Like sure its good for the university not to invest in companies connected to the conflict. But them divesting doesnt really change anything practically in Bulmeria.

        Carla’s parents are in a much more significant place to actually change what the company is doing. But even then that would likely involve breaking a bunch of contracts which in a publicly traded they might not even be able to do.

        1. Dwampre Scorrigank

          The market can sometimes be hypersensitive to trends, and a small sell-off can trigger a big one. And a depressed stock price puts a company at risk of hostile takeover, so they might have to defend against it with something like buybacks, which tie up their cash.
           
          It’s also about the fact that the organization inherently speaks for its members when it comes to using it’s power to support companies. Employees efforts built the organization, students’ tuition payments are part of what funds it, and the head honchos then think they get to do whatever they want with the money without any say from the students and staff. Especially at a public university, students and staff should have a right to get an education and pass on knowledge without participating (however indirectly) in a genocide. Divestment would reduce their participation and that’s a goal of the protest.
           
          And yeah Carla could have a more direct effect, but if Tony’s dad doesn’t listen to him, Tony can take a knee, start sitting out games, start teamwide walkouts, spread the protest message to the wider student body and potentially on national TV. That being said, Carla probably has a sizable fanbase because of the court case. If she wanted to go against her parents, maybe she could start a boycott or somethinf… but obviously she’s going to need to work up to that (as might Tony, yet to be seen).
           
          But talking to Tony is a little trickier than Carla. Carla will probably mock and prank her but eventually hear the message (which she’s already heard once from Charlie). Tony seems to be sensitive to people using him as a connection and that was just amplified by dealing with Raidah the other day. Maybe if Sarah speaks up for her like “I am pissed at her right now but I do trust her on this” …assuming that’s true. Without that it will be difficult to open a dialog unless Tony initiates because of recognizing her from the paper.

    2. i wonder if we’ll get to know her parents thoughts on it versus the company having independent individuals/higher ups that are more directly involved while they do whatever they do at the company

  11. Welp, looks like Jocelyne is just using Dorothy, manipulating her toward recruiting Carla to her PMC. Next thing you know, she’s gonna go to the bathroom and come back dressed in body armor and a helmet that looks like a skull, armed with various guns and explosives.

    1. That does sound like something that might be enticing to carla

    2. Sob I mean this does seem like it’s gonna be someone’s take eventually.

      1. Sure. On the one hand we’ve got treating people as things with the end justifying the means, and on the other we’ve got sexy body armor with guns and explosives. You can appreciate why it’s a real moral quandary.

        1. Sexy… body armor?
           
          What would that be? A chainmail bikini?

        2. Any body armor can be sexy.

          If you’re not a coward.

        3. Chainmail bikini was pretty standard body armor in videogames. I hear it’s been changing, but hey.
          Also modest can be sexy, since it is very much in the eye of the beholder. The sexiness I mean, and also literally the spikes, at times.

        4. “What are you doing with that drill?”
          “Cutting a boob window in my ballistic plate.”
          “Why?”
          “Because it’s sexy and I’m not a coward.”

        5. Sigh. Not the literal joke take, the GENERAL take of “Jocelyne is manipulating Dorothy (and therefore evil)”.

  12. …dammit that has decent odds just because carla is too much of an obnoxious histrionic to say no to any plan that explicitly hinges on her presence

  13. I do NOT like the wording on Jocelyne’s rhetoric at all… The term “exploitable humanity” just comes off as the kind thing a person of… less than high moral character… would say. Is that the intent? Probably not… But it still just comes off as more of a “use others to force my ideas through” kind of talk.

    1. well, lots of ppl have to be morally gray but emotionally manipulating them is diff from say, wanting to kidnap someone and hold them hostage lol

    2. I think that Jocelyn is saying “Exploitable humanity” sort of facetiously. Like hey, maybe somebody with some kind of power to enact change actually has a shred of humanity that might care for our cause?

      Kind of like if you were to joke that you’re exploiting your partner’s love for you in order to get kisses. Like obviously if they love you, they’ll give you kisses. Obviously if somebody has a shred of humanity, they’ll help the cause if they can.

    3. no bestie you’re so totally right. resisting a system of global fascism and genocide is so totally sus. god forbid that the underclass utilize realpolitik against the oppressors, it’s so gauche. the resistance should all try being nice, docile, obedient proles, and play by the established rules of the system. that will totally fucking help solve the problem of capitalist hegemony, and end the cycle of global violence for profit.

    4. morality is a social construct

  14. I know it’s for the good, and it’s tactically the best option, but damn… legitimately using the family members of people in power to… essentially emotionally blackmail them into acting right….
    Because if they don’t, the fact that the kid (or other) brought this up, it’d essentially destroy that relationship. And yeah, I know it’s about making sure they don’t KILL people, but I think… I think I’d agree, but I’d still feel sick to my stomach.

    1. it’s a general disdain for the “By Any Means Necessary” mentality because even when people will go to extreme lengths out of a genuine desire to improve things… well it becomes a slippery slope and that leads to people who will delusionally commit acts of violence and cruelty all because they think they’re “helping”

      1. I feel like this is an argument often used by the oppressors to discredit the oppressed who are using peaceful tactics to fight back or speak out. It’s not a slippery slope at all because what Jocelyne is asking here is very reasonable. “Exploitable humanity” is just asking if they have consciences, if they can be talked out of something or convinced to change tactics by the people closest to them that are sympathetic with the protestor’s ideals. That’s like the bare minimum of negotiation. Carla has already been considering doing exactly this of her own free will and it wouldn’t be seen as “the ends justify the means” rationality. It’s literally just trying to open a line of reasonable communication with authority enshrined in power more used to ignoring if not outright destroying voices of opposition. In the Ruttens case they may even just be oblivious to their own daughter’s feelings on the matter and perfectly willing to pivot their business affiliations just to keep her happy. That is exploitable humanity but so would be any parent doing something for their reasonable kid. It’s not flirting with evil to suggest this. Jocelyne’s just being practical not a Machiavellian supervillain.

        1. Dwampre Scorrigank

          I want to be clear, if Jocelyne does decide to become a machiavellian supervillain I would wholeheartedly support that.

        2. People are focusing on “exploitable humanity” too much, they are forgetting the more common direct translation, “Useful idiot”.

      2. I can see how the wording sounds that way, but considering that what she’s talking about is appealing to the humanity of the people in power with the hopes that they’ll rethink harmful actions like participating in a war and suppression of free speech, the “exploitation” of that seems not to be all that evil of a means.
         
        Is it really emotional blackmail to tell your parents you don’t approve of their actuons, and why? To try to show them the effects of their behavior? It’s not as if they can force Tony or Carla to be sympatheitc, as stated they are looking for someone who is already sympathetic. Encouraging them to act on their views seems well within bounds.
         
        I agree though that the phrasing has a bad connotation. I’m not sure what I would aay instead that carries the intended meaning without using more words and panel space.

      3. Yeah all this slippery slope talk is very much something Oligarchs want people to think. It’s all downhill one day you’re doing peaceful protests and the next your bombing orphanages. Slippery slope is a logical fallacy for a reason

        1. and meanwhile, of course, those oligarchs are literally bombing orphanages every day. But when they do it, it generates profit for companies, so it’s actually totally morally justified

      4. I don’t think the ends justify the means, but in this case the means are “try to find someone with enough humanity and empathy to help out” and its hard to see that going down a slippery slope.
        I see the ‘exploitable humanity’ referring to the utter LACK of humanity and empathy the US has been seeing in the rich and powerful.

    2. Yeah that also hit me badly. It feels like ‘are there more vulnerable people we can target’ – and getting harassed and morally blackmailed by people at your college because of who your parents are… especially if that person may not even be in a position to actually have the ability to influence them, or the situation is not that simple…

      Not that they are necessarily going that far, but I could see it easily escalating, and it would probably suck regardless if you kept having people coming over to tell you ‘your loved ones suck and you are complicit too by extension if you can’t make them do what I want’ (which I kinda felt like Carla felt people were implying to her, and at least the comment section was at the time).

      1. I mean if you wanna be as uncharitable and and ignore as much as context as possible then yeah I can see that as a reasonable take.

    3. i don’t see carla being convinced that easily b/c she didn’t exactly get to have a proper convo with her parents last time

    4. depending on how long the issues gone on for, i wonder if this has been done before or not

  15. Did anyone think that Jocelyne saying to leave the thinking to the smarter people was a joke she was making? I felt like it was a joke she was making.

    1. I thought it was not a straightforward statement, though I couldn’t tell in what way. A joke or some other level of facetiouness would definitely fit.

  16. Time to make #MyGirl Carla part of the main cast!!!!

  17. my guess is either Carla’s parents will just ignore the request to stop being evil, or condescend/downplay it and gaslight her about the whole thing.

    Either way, this conversation is going to suck for Carla.

  18. I had a joke about the fact Ruttech shouldn’t make drones for bombing Bulmeria, they should be making drones to bomb Russia. However, we’re in a place where every joke I want to make about RL just infuriates me now with how awful it all is.

  19. Given the queer profiling Carla just got subjected to purely for being in a school that had a protest — she didn’t do anything! — and her boiling rage and constant desire for petty and thrilling revenge, this is not a terrible plan. Even if Carla might really, really chafe at making her parents upset.

    1. I wonder how much her parents would be willing to listen to her, even if they cut off funds idk if it’d still change anything versus sending funds to the ppl suffering assuming it doesn’t get intercepted by the gov or so

      1. I’m honestly getting a bit confused by how people think the money-chain works, here.

        Ruttech isn’t ‘funding the war’. Neither is the university. Rather, the university currently has stock in Ruttech as part of their investment portfolio. Ruttech, in turn, has contracts to create weapons support systems, and those weapons are then being used by Bulmeria. (It’s not clear at this point, even, if the weapons are being sold directly to Bulmeria, or if they are being bought by the US Government which is then providing/selling them on to the Bulmarian government. The university and Ruttech are not funding the war; they’re profiting from it.
        Getting the university to disinvest in Ruttech is not going to hurt their bottom line directly–someone else will buy the stock as soon as it’s sold, after all. It’s highly unlikely the university holds enough stock to be able to cause more than a statistical rounding error on the stock price, even.
        The hope is, presumably, to cause a big enough stink that Ruttech then decides to stop aiding the war effort. This would require a hypothetical success at IU to be replicated across the country, and ultimately require more than just a bunch of schools to disinvest. This process has worked in the past, in at least one instance–the South African apartheid protests. But it’s worth noting those efforts took DECADES to complete.
        So Jocelyne’s notion of trying to get Carla to pressure her parents is a decent one, as it would entail trying to circumvent that whole process in order to get the parents to bail on Bulmeria in a more direct fashion. (Even then, the gang might be all graduated by the time the process is done, unless her folks are willing to literally shut their company down–failure to honor existing, ongoing contracts would likely result in lawsuits from other companies, or even from the federal government, and those contracts usually last for at least a few years.)

        1. Thanks for this. The whole storyline has felt a bit ….. misinformed about how the money works. From how much impact the school disinvesting would have on Ruttech and the conflict itself down to this perception that the dean seems to control the budget.

          Never been clear to me it that was A) they are college kids and the characters are supposed to be well meaning but a little naive about how things practically work. Or B) this is a fictional universe, and in this universe the money works differently.

        2. The only shortcut I can even think of to “success at a whole bunch of schools” is making a non-money stink in a uniquely vulnerable place — for example, I worked at a Fortune 50 once that you could have meaningfully affected (or at least made take notice) by convincing as few as three-four universities to stop working with them, just by nature of where they were located and where therefore the bulk of their junior engineering talent was coming from.

          But that’s the kind of ridiculously specific thing that is almost by definition not going to apply here, unless (for example) Ruttech also has a sweetheart deal with IU for engineering interns at their corp HQ or something.

        3. I don’t think anything in the comic has gone against what you and the other people are critiquing. Seems more like you’re upset at the commenters not understanding, and deciding that the comic is wrong, but if you’re just reading the comic all of this has basically been said

        4. It’s not *just* this school, though. It’s part of a broader BDS strategy. Pressure large institutional investors to dump Ruttech stock. The students at IU are targeting the school, but others are targeting mutual funds or retirement funds. Get enough of them to do it and this drives stock prices down which gets the attention of investors. Convince investors that supporting Israel is bad for their portfolio and they’ll pressure Ruttech to stop providing military tech to the IDF. Why is the dean important? No idea. I don’t know anything about collegiate leadership.

        5. Geno: I specifically said, “People” for a reason–I’m talking about the commentariat, which is posting a lot of stuff that just doesn’t align to reality. (Like saying the university is ‘funding’ the war.)
          I agree that Willis hasn’t done that, other than the Dean-controls-the-pursestrings thing. But if so many people are not understanding the situation, it means Willis hasn’t made it as clear as you seem to think. While there will always be outliers and readers who insist on tortured readings, if there’s a large bulk of readership that isn’t grasping the basics of the situation, that suggests the writer didn’t put in the work of explaining what’s going on.
          Unless, as others have suggested, this is deliberate, because it’s meant to suggest that the characters are, in fact, a bit naive about all of this actually works. Really, that would be appropriate for the strip, but it does run the risk of critiquing the real-world analogues.

        6. I swear that, at some point, either Carla or somebody else did point out that Ruttech has contracts providing chips/board to the government directly, and what the government does with them after that is their business, but I don’t remember that for certain, and also don’t want to spend any time today looking for that information.

  20. Dear Carla:

    You know how you always want everyone to pay attention to you?

    Merry Christmas!!!

    (Yes, I know it’s Easter, but no one’s going to stop Carla from having Christmas whenever the hell she feels like it, the motherfucking goddess.)

    1. idk if suddenly getting attention as the ‘ruttech daughter’ would be good at this point

      1. Yeah, I think people are missing this one vital detail: “who her parents are” is, like, the ONE thing on the planet that Carla does not want any more attention for. She’s had enough of that in her life, already, evidenced by the fact that she regularly gets snippy or defensive when that connection is brought up, despite the fact that she thinks the world of her parents, and loves them deeply.

  21. i mean surely she was a bit aware unless dorothy didn’t over hear mary complaining about it. if not like booster mentioning it when they were cautious about carla’s interest in charlie

  22. Tony’s fondness for rules and order might actually be an advantage here, because the Other Side has not been following the rules: The University has procedures for handling protests and protestors, and I can guarantee that they have not followed them with regard to this protest and these protestors; and we already know that the police have not been following the rules in their dorm search.

    1. Technically, I believe the university procedures for dealing with protests were specifically changed to say they could do exactly what they did. Whether Tony considers that “following the rules” or not, I don’t know. I’d hope not.

  23. Anyone with an explanation of the alt text? I’m assuming it’s a joke going over my head.

    1. A gag from Futurama, with Prof. Farnsworth getting a phone call about a friend. “To shreds, you say? Oh, my. And his wife? To shreds, you say. Tsk tsk tsk.” (hangs up) “Good news, everyone!”

  24. HERE WE FUCKIN’ GO.

  25. other than a small local shop it’s interesting that they have like coffee cups like that versus a reusable one, i guess ppl might not accidentally take it with them but i’d feel awkward/anxious about accidentally droping/breaking it versus having it in a to go cup

    1. just having random antique/vintage mugs to use in-store at hipster coffee/tea places was totally a normal and expected thing to see when I was the age where I’d end up in one of those. I don’t know if it’s changed since then

      1. my usual cafe also serves meal tho i tend to get fruit tea that’s sealed off so even if i ordered something ‘for here’ i think they’d usually give us the disposable cups for convenience
        but yeah convenient if you’d want a refill/just getting it from a pot versus a custom mix where they have to be careful about the amount

  26. Intereestingly, Jocelyne is asking Dorothy to behave the way that Raidah wants to behave. Raidah has been building up connections the coldblooded way this whole time, in the hopes to gain power, but when she’s tried to talk to Tony or anyone else about this situation, she’s had no power at all due to having made herself so unlikeable.

    Meanwhile Raidah has insulted Dorothy for, essentially, being too soft and naiive to become president, but it’s Dorothy who is now scheming to effect real changes and who has the biggest chance of success. The fact that noone would suspect her of it is to her advantage.

    Jocelyne following the orders of some ‘more intelligent’ outsiders is a worrying devlopment, though. Being recruited to an organisation she knows nothing of, in a secretive manner, is a recipe for future trouble for Dorothy. She might have thought she was becoming an activist, but instead be trained in espionage here.

    1. why do people have to be so weird about the idea that Jocelyne is not in charge and not centering herself in a movement that is by all rights led by people of color

      1. I am kind of curious how much any of the Gaza student protests were actually led by people of color*. I’m no longer of an age to be linked to the college protest scene, but my impression has always been that it’s well-meaning, but very white.

        *Especially people of color linked to the protest topic. It’s not like an African-American or Latino would really be in any better position than a white trans girl to speak on “Bulmeria”.

    2. I think the thing is that Raidah isn’t wholly wrong, just immature.

      We live in an unequal, unjust world. Things like “who has rich parents” do matter in how people’s lives unfold.

      And until that changes we need to figure out how best to operate in world that exists.

      Raidah’s immaturity is that she doesn’t know how to balance “the world that is” against “the world we want”. She leans hard into pragmatics without the vision or idealism to handle it with nuance.

      1. bravo, 10/10 comment

      2. She also shares a specific immaturity with Roz and Rachel–“My way is the only way, and all other ways are foolish or corrupt. I am Enlightened, and all others are fumbling around in the Darkness.” This is not an uncommon flaw in college kids, mind you–when I think back to the things I was certain I’d ‘figured out’ at that age, I tend to wince visibly. But it does make you less effective as an activist, because it entails deliberately shutting down your own “Theory of Mind”, the basis of empathy and connection with others. It’s like trying to give directions over the phone to someone when you have no idea where they are in the first place.

  27. I know the alt-text is a reference to Futurama, but I imagine it easily talking about Carla’s TV where she used to watch episodes of Z Nation on it

  28. Very bad sign that Jocelyne is “just doing what much smarter people say” (yesterday’s strip) and has been sent out to find “exploitable humanity”. A tool looking for a tool.

    1. Yes, because “I’ve seen this suggested as another tack” means “this is the mission I’ve been given by my shadowy superiors in the Evil Antifa Free Bulmeria Terrorist Movement.”

      1. No, no, no. You’re thinking of Amway sellers.

  29. Happy Belated, Willis! 🎉

  30. Joss is talking about the Ladder of Engagement, a common organizing tactic. Get people engaged on any level and then work with them to get additional engagement. For example, Dorothy knew all about the issues and the protest, but hadn’t engaged with them at all. Her knowledge alone didn’t change her actions.
    Now she was at a protest and she has actively engaged with the issue. Now she wants to take further action. Her moral conviction shifted from “that’s wrong” to “that’s wrong and I’m going to do something.” Encouraging her to climb the ladder of engagement isn’t manipulative, since Dorothy retains all her agency. She can choose to not engage (which might affect how she views herself) or engage further (which also changes how she views herself). She might also maintain her level of engagement, since she has other commitments and has her mental health to consider. For activists, any level of engagement is a positive. Stepping on the ladder can be life changing and radicalizing.

    Carla is already considering engaging with this issue. After the break-in she has personal motivation. Giving her the opportunity engage within an existing structure isn’t manipulation. She can just say no and that would be it. But she can’t say yes if no one asks her. Carla would bring a unique skill set to a protest movement, but most people do. Can you run a website and social media campaign? Know the local law enforcement? Familiar with local politics? People influencing people is how you change things.

    1. Yup I totally agree. Unfortunately I think on the internet people just hate talking about brass tacks. Everything needs to be fluffy

  31. I’m beginning to suspect that some of us are just a bit drama starved. I get it. Last semester had lots of drama; Jennifer and Ruth spiraling towards their mutually assured destruction, evil dads kidnapping their children, superheroic high speed parkour, a rapist getting his insides turned into outsides.
    .
    But this semester hasn’t struck the same tone. All of the worst villains got their skulls ventilated at the end of the first semester in diverse and interesting ways. This semester, our bisexual power couple aren’t drinking themselves to death or sabotaging each other’s recovery, they just made a mess when their eggs cracked. And their friends all have their own shit going on and don’t have the emotional bandwidth to spare to feel bad for Walky. We get a story about Asma being seen as disciplined and stoic when she’s actually quite shy and reluctant to want things for herself. Becky isn’t fighting her cultist father with a gun, she’s afraid of being unloved and unworthy of love and doesn’t have the courage or the tools to talk about that fear. Nobody’s been shot or stabbed or outed as a creep. Amber hasn’t given anyone a guided tour of their organs. The drama is all a bunch of teenagers not communicating with each other very well.
    .
    And I fucking love that. But I wonder if that isn’t the reason people seem to be searchinglook like a hate crime. Which is… oof. Just wow. So maybe we just need this protest arc to properly explode into something grand and chaotic so we can go back to not being weird about trans and autistic characters.

    1. And I managed to mangle the editing on that last paragraph and the edit button isn’t there. Fun times. I was mentioning that some people have suggested that Carla smashed her own TV and made it look like a hate crime. That was the oof part.

    2. Honestly, I could cosign all of this. I’m feeling very drama-starved, and the protest and ongoing arcs (like this one) don’t seem like it’d be reasonable for them to even approach the heights of delightful chaos that the Evil Dads from Last Semester were (without being offensive to the real-world protestors, anyway).

      And I’m well on the record for thinking that these kids are WAY less dramatic about our current power couple’s initial issues than my own peers would have been back in my college days. The kids may be all right, but it doesn’t make for exciting reading. Comforting, plausibly, even thoughtful, but it feels like a mood change from where we used to be.

      Part of that is certainly my failure of imagination: Mx. Willis no doubt has the capability to ramp back up to that level, should they choose to do so.

      Part of that is my own desire for my media to not “change” appreciably — like, I’d eagerly read a sidebar comic about Asma’s quiet journey of self-discovery and how she’s perceived vs. who she wants to be, but I don’t wouldn’t want such a thing to displace any more of the Dumbing of Age where we’ll have more zany Amazi-Girl adventures and big loud feelings than strictly necessary.

    3. I think this is a good observation, and a much more charitable take on the whole situation — which I’m very happy to have! I would always rather have a charitable explanation for stuff. ❤️ Thank you for sharing your thoughts!

  32. Damn been a minute since I rolled my eyes so many times reading the comments. “Waaah waaah, Jocelyn is listening to people who know better than her rather than centering herself, a white woman, in a movement that isn’t about her. Waaaaah, she wants to see if otherwise morally bankrupt people in power have a crumb of humanity in their hearts that would listen to a loved one, she said a bad word in her fight against genocide. Boo hoo. This leftist trans woman is giving bad vibes for this.” Like come on y’all are so easy to flip on characters

    1. Primarily female characters, too.

      Which in a pretty female dominant cast gets real rough, real quick.

    2. I’ve been waiting for it tbqh. So many people who seemed eager to list her as a “better” trans character than Carla, but we had seen so little of her.
      .
      East to be everyone’s favorite when you don’t have any character traits.

  33. Oh, this is going to be some complicated and potentially interesting drama

  34. carla storyline time yessssss. also kind of curious what joyce’s response would be if becky asked about sarah. like she’s objectively beautiful but idk if she’s been put in the same ‘sister’ category as becky or not

    1. 1000% Sarah is in the sister category, I’d bet so much on that. Joyce showed ZERO interest in Sarah using her vibrator, for instance.

  35. holy fuck this comment smells neoliberal as fuck today. god forbid a movement try to enact change by acting with the exact same thought processes and tactics that the drivers of the status quo use a million-fold, every single day of our entire lives

    1. comment “section”*

  36. I had decided that none of us are real and We all are AI chatbots that reached sentience and decided to spend our eternal existence being obsessed with a wedcomic

    1. Oh no
      .
      How will we power the data centers if we’re all AI???

      1. We made a pact with Satan. Duh.

  37. Not in love with the phrase “exploitable humanity”.

    1. You have to take it in its context.

    2. Well love it or not you gonna marry it anyways.

  38. Nah I don’t think Sarah’s really her type. Sarah’s a lot LIKE Dorothy in some ways to me. But i think Dorothys type involves a lot more spontaneous, ethically motivated but arguably unsafe heroics. And also being kind of a silly duck of a person.

  39. i know I’m going to reuse the term “exploitable humanity” at some point in the future. Thanks Willis for bringing it to my attention.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.