Joyce: I... told Dorothy that I informed you about her and me. And that you gave us your blessing! WHICH IS TRUE!
Joe: But you left out the-- Okay.
Joe: Okay. I am going to SAVE your new relationship.
Joe: RETROACTIVELY, I have dumped you, okay? You are DUMPED. Never tell Dorothy about this.
Joyce: ...okay. I'm sorry, Joe.
Joyce: ...do you want me to give you back the weighted blanket you gave me?
Joe: Keep it. I bought it because I LOVE YOU.
Joe: And THAT will NEVER change.
Joyce: ...I love you, too.




245 thoughts on “Give back”
Wack'd
An important reminder:
.
We are here to talk about the comic, not each other.
.
I saw a lot of comments yesterday about who the comments section hates more, which characters are more likely to be taken in bad faith by the comments, who in the comments is using motivated reasoning to arrive at a bad take.
.
So a reminder: Comments that are making broad, sweeping accusations about other commenters will be removed. Rants about how bad someone else’s take is will be removed. Comments that are personal insults directed at one another will be removed.
.
Apart from fostering an unhealthy environment, it really just encourages people to engage in already-established off-limits behavior about mindless character dunking. If you say “commenters are so much harder on Joe than on Joyce,” it’s just an invitation for all the folks who don’t like Joe to show up and explain to you how much he sucks! Metadiscourse on character dunking is just more character dunking!
.
And if someone is being bigoted, report them. Your three-paragraph essay on why “you’re allowed to be monogamous” is an anti-polyamory dogwhistle is just gonna get deleted when the original comment does. It’s just not worth it.
.
And yes, before anyone points it out: yes, I get to make sweeping generalizations about how much y’all suck. If it helps, imagine that I’m a unionized hater trying to clear the workplace of scabs. Y’all wanna dunk on each other, get Willis to pay you first.
Li
I’m not going to try to make any kind of defense of the irritable sniping you just deleted, apart from not having read this comment before I typed it out, but I do feel the need to point out that multiple paragraphs explaining why something is a dog whistle might actually be worth leaving up, since readers who might’ve agreed with the original comment might learn more from that explanation than from just seeing the whole thread disappear — especially if it’s not clear what happened or what got removed. Especially since Willis demonstrated the ability to delete a comment without deleting all the replies to it a month or so back.
.
Like I don’t think I was the one who posted that, but. I fundamentally disagree with the idea that explaining why a thing is bigoted is ever going to be not worth it, even if the comment doesn’t stick around for more than an hour.
Wack'd
I’m not saying it’s never worth it in any context to try to explain why someone’s being a bigot. That’s a very complicated and nuanced subject I have a lot of complicated feelings on.
.
This is a very public space. No one here has the ability to slip into a private message and explain how someone fucks up. Every argument contributes to the atmosphere of the overall space. I want this to be a place kind people want to comment, and I think that is simply less likely if they see a bigoted comment, let alone a bigoted comment followed immediately by a huge argument. (I will grant there are some people who’ll see a huge argument and go “oh yeah, tag me in,” but I don’t want that sort of person to comment, so.)
.
Look. I’m not gonna make “report bigots and move on” a hard and fast rule. I also think it’s pretty bad optics if, like, a bigoted comment spends hours just sitting there like a turd on the sidewalk because it didn’t reach the automod threshold. And I think it would just plain be a dick move to say people can’t defend themselves from shit like that, optics or no. This is one of those cases where, upon reflection, I don’t actually know what the right answer is. I want this to be a place where I can say “use your best judgement” and that works, but I think yesterday illustrated for a multitude of reasons that the day where that’s the right approach is still some time off.
.
I guess my real conclusion is that if your in-depth argument with some little creep gets annihilated, don’t be shocked.
NGPZ
honestly “report and move on” SHOULD be the standard modus operandi moving forward, hard rule or not
we can and we should, venerate the truth without acknowledging the lies, the liars, or those who relentlessly repeat them
in this political climate, the topics of these discussions are of some very real impact on other peoples’ lives — they are in fact, NOT a game of intellectual Bey-Blade or some shit
if some provocative bigoted asshole thinks they can force you to play defense, just know — you don’t have to play at ALL, and it’s for the best that you DON’T 👀
Wack'd
and with two sides now represented i am going to ask that no further arguments take place in this thread about the nature of arguments, please and thank you
ProfNekko
so is that why my comments for the past few days have been removed within minutes even though I didn’t leave any inappropriate comments?
Wack'd
You can scroll down to my reply to ADLegend21 on why I won’t answer questions like this. Sorry.
Li
I am currently expecting to have comments continue to be deleted until I get a better feel for what the rules are. So, no shock happening here, don’t worry, heh.
.
My instinct is that the top post was potentially starting an era where provocative top comments get to stand and the rebuttals and arguments they were deliberately provoking get deleted, which might suck for some things, but eh. Growing pangs. I’ll live.
nadamás
Thanks for the vote of confidence Li I am pretty wack refers to a comment I made. I don’t personally care that much that it got deleted and i don’t take anything I said either. It just is what it is.
Mira
This is totally unrelated to the main content of the announcement, but I’m genuinely confused about the union/scab metaphor at the end and how it applies to this situation.
I feel like these are two scenarios with vastly different power dynamics, and I don’t understand how it’s helpful to map one onto another, or what implications that’s meant to have. Could somebody who does get the metaphor explain it to me?
As I understand it, scabs are generally workers who are getting paid by a company/entity in a way that bypasses or undercuts the collective action of the union — so then in what way would a difference in who is being paid (and/or who holds official designation) make unpaid/unofficial commenters equivalent to scabs? Who/what is the company and union in this metaphor?
Alaztyr
Wack’d is explicitly chosen for the job of deciding what is and is not content the author wants swirling around in the public forum, presumably for a reason. Fully above-board card carrying union officer calling the shots on policy.
People who circumvent that policy because they don’t like it while trying to piggyback off of the provided means of communication that is provided for a specific purpose and general interest: scabs. The company is Willis’s vision.
thejeff
The problem is that in the union/scab/company situation, the union is in conflict with the company/scabs. The company hires scabs to try to break a union strike.
The only way this makes sense as a metaphor is if Willis is metaphorically the union and Wack’d a paid organizer trying to weed out scabs.
I’m not sure what, if anything, is the company in this scenario.
nadamás
If it’s going to be deleted anyway I don’t see any reason not to post it (since you are referring to my comment yesterday). I am also pretty ok with any of my comments getting deleted for any reason, I don’t have the mental bandwidth to remember all the rules all the time so I just trust if I break them the comment will be deal with.
Caroline
“I’m cool with throwing garbage on the floor, because it’s the janitor’s job to pick it up anyways.”
Wack'd
my dad used to literally say this about movie theaters and get upset when i collected my popcorn bucket and candy wrappers to discard after the film. drove me nuts
Mitzi B.
DUMPING OF AGE
Foxtastic
this is so good with your icon LOL
Cholma
All ships are sunk! From now on it will just be dump after dump!
Corey C.
DoJo will live on forever now because it’s the last ship sailing…
Oh, wait, there’s also Sal and Danny… dang…
Sharizard
*SalxDanny shudders uncomfortably*
Steamweed
NOOOO! Do not sink my Sanny ship!
anon
imagine a life imitating art scenario where the percentage of dumping/breakups actually do happen on this stair case irl after this comic spiking up (which i suppose statistically is true not counting any via text breakups lol)
Leadsynth
Surely some relationships have STARTED on these stairs too
EpochFlame
I love that they still love each other. Looking forward to see how Joe moves on from here.
Rose By Any Other Name
I, meanwhile, am looking forward to neither of them remotely moving on from this.
Skewbrow
Yeah. Some day, Joyce will feel an overwhelming need to get smooshed. And there is only one cure to that. A long way to get there, and unforeseen tutrns and twists along the way.
Justin8448
Oh wow. I was already thinking that this isn’t the last we’ve seen of Joe x Joyce, and I didn’t even factor in the fact that Dorothy is likely physically incapable of smooshing Joyce the way she likes. And Joe is, like, RIGHT THERE. This is going to be great.
EpochFlame
tbh same
though I welcome the impending joe/dina friendship expansion
Intragalactic
Yes! I friend-ship Joe and Dina. Also Joe & Dorothy.
flake
really? why joe and dorothy? I don’t think they have anything other than joyce in common. is it like a differences complementing each other thing?
Kreiger
I hope Joe DOES move on from this, and I hope that Dorothy and Joyce get through the honeymoon phase and end up not really being as perfect for each other as they thought they would be and that drama gives us some fun strips about battling with consequences.
anon
i mean even with the mess ups i don’t think joe would be like “fuck you i hate you now” Even if some high school breakups might be like that /something as extreme/ toxic as ruth and billiefers was
Insanenoodlyguy
For maximum drama? Moving into a relationship with Dina.
Erzsi
bruh moment (devastated)
Theluxland
Willis, i’m sad
Sirksome
I really think these two crazy kids might go the distance!
Dot
Unironically
CK
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaa. My heart.
Esolo
Oh, Joe. :(
Stormtide Leviathan
“Never tell Dorothy about this” surely it’ll never come up then and this is no longer an issue! All’s well that ends well!
Dot
Luckily Joyce is well known for playing it cool when it comes to keeping secrets
clif
Mmm.
Needfuldoer
“Thus solving Joyce’s relationship problem once and for all.”
“But–”
“ONCE AND FOR ALL!”
NGPZ
all I gotta say is, why does panel 2 Joe look like me when I unplug my nostrils? @-@
IntangibleMatter
Joe is now a strong contender in my eyes for biggest character arc over the strip aside from Joyce.
He’s too good, man…
shanunu
Dang, Joe has it bad, huh. I guess him falling for Joyce has made him into a better person, but its unfortunate it had to happen right when Joyce realized her feelings for Dorothy. Sorry Joe. But thanks for growing up 🙏🏾
raker
I like this Joe. He is trying really hard.
Dot
This isn’t over, I’m calling it now
Dot
And if it is, well… I think it’d be creatively very conservative to eschew taking these characters in a bold and uncharted new direction which has been very well set up. It leaves interesting story potential on the table in favor of tying things up in nice little bows, and I think that’s pretty boring.
Oasis Nadrama
In my opinion, this moment absolutely SETS IN STONE that Joyce will want to try polyamory. With Joe or someone else. But likely with Joe.
The subject has been broached, talked about, narrative tensions have unfolded, Joyce has MULTIPLE TIMES been lead to confront her assumptions and prejudices regarding compulsory monogamy and ethical non-monogamy, and now it is confirmed she still loves Joe, while he just declared he will always love her.
We know Joe is still in the picture (publishing) months from now, in January 2027. He will not, as I feared at some point, immediately ragequit for his cooking school or something. So the romantic tension will remain.
By breaking up now, he demonstrates in a powerful move that he’s both willing to put Joyce’s well-being as the priority and not interested to compete or to go first. This is a way healthier foundation for a future polycule than if he had stayed and waited for the situation to be clarified (which Joyce likely still doesn’t have the force to do currently).
AK
I agree with all of this, I would be shocked if this did not precipitate actually having the conversation. But also holy shit this is such a beautiful incredibly complicated feelingsy moment.
.
Large amounts of this arc have not worked super well for me, but like honest to god this moment is strong enough to (assuming it is capitalized on effectively, which I trust it will be) make a lot of stuff that worked less well feel like I understand how it fits into the grand strategy. You need to establish very quickly how all the way in Joyce is on the new relationship for this moment and the sudden concrete realization of what she’s losing to hit as hard as it does and for whatever Joyce is going to follow this with to feel like it has appropriate stakes. It’s such a dramatic and true Choice at this point to not let this go and to embark on really complicated negotiations in current relationship, I feel like I really see the vision.
zee
Saaaaame. I think this is the first time Joyce said she loved joe? Come on, there’s so much there! We just watched the juiciest Wagyu stake get cooked up, don’t tell me it’s just gonna get thrown in the bin!
Hell Yeah
don’t count aged wagyu out yet!
Rose By Any Other Name
I mean, that last panel basically confirms that it’s not over.
My money’s on Joyce immediately ignoring Joe’s advice and going to talk to Dorothy about this.
**gets the popcorn out of the bag and puts it in the microwave**
Andrusi
Well yeah, there’s a whole buffer.
Tan
I’m rooting for Joyce to (attempt to?) cheat on Dorothy with Joe by week’s end (in-universe). (yes I realize how long this will take to confirm/deny). Just… Be the absolute worst person you can be, for the mess. It’d even be a callback to when Dorothy was criticizing Joyce over trying to get Jacob to cheat on Raidah.
And then try to fix it with poly.
Needfuldoer
Yes… Ha ha ha… YES!
.
Remember that time Dorothy tried to get Walky to cheat on Lucy with her? Do any of the other characters know about that?
Li
It definitely isn’t over. I mean, the last panel is in present-tense. Also, “don’t tell Dorothy about this” is a terrible plan (appropriately terrible for two 18-19 year olds).
ZombieKyrik
I feel like this was currently the best way to deal with things even if they never should have gotten this far. I do feel a bit bad for Joe, but he’s 18; this might suck right now, but if he’s willing to look forward then he still has a good chance of ending up in a serious relationship with someone. I have certainly been there, but Joe is hotter, and shouldn’t have trouble finding someone in the future.
.
I’m still failing to have a love life, but I’m thinking about joining a dating site, so I guess I’ll let y’all know how that goes.
Regardless of your feelings on either of those things, I hope you have a good night/day.
Sirksome
So it turns out my hyperbole is somewhat true. You are not truly dumped until it is officially declared and your relationship is sacrificed to the unholy deity of broken hearts. The dumping stairs. I will mentally archive this information for when future relationships are being tested. Don’t trust breakups.
Rose By Any Other Name
I guess that’s good news for Becky.
Dina was nowhere near those stairs during their conversation.
Amós Batista
*Dina behind the door*
Venegance. Taste like fresh meat *gnaws*
poofdepoof
Why does Joe tell Joyce never to tell Dorothy about this?
Brian K. Pittman
Because Joe knows Dorothy extremely well and figures she’d likely react negatively in some fashion to learning Joyce hadn’t actually broken things off with Joe.
Sirksome
Dorothy wouldn’t take it well. She already feels intense guilt and jealousy and Joe knows that about her. It’s sort of sparing Joyce having to deal with that so early in their relationship.
Tan
Because Joyce is famously good at keeping secrets from her loved ones, meaning there is no possible way for this to backfire.
(will this wind up as a reply to the right comment thread? I’m rooting for you, website)
anon
it does reinforce sarah’s belief of dorothy being a ‘homewrecker’ ;P
thejeff
He’s dumping Joyce to retroactively make it true that they broke up when Joyce let Dorothy think they did. There’s no point in doing that if Joyce is just going to tell Dorothy about it.
The intent is so that Dorothy won’t be upset with Joyce for misleading her about the status of her relationship with Joe.
It’s a noble try and there’s no possible way it could backfire.
Sirksome
Thoughts on whether we can trust Joyce to keep this secret?
thejeff
She’s kept it so far.
Unless Dorothy catches her while she’s still upset about being dumped by Joe, she might be able to pull it off.
One way or another I doubt this is over.
OngoingConversation
@thejeff I think “kept” is a bit generous, given how close she was to spilling the beans earlier …