Hey, look, more art of Ruth! This time, it’s be Erika Peterson. Ruth looks pleasant. … suspiciously pleasant. Hrn.
This can’t be good.
Discussion (9) ¬
[ Comments RSS ]
Hey, look, more art of Ruth! This time, it’s be Erika Peterson. Ruth looks pleasant. … suspiciously pleasant. Hrn.
This can’t be good.
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com ⋅ 15h
Pavel
@spavel.bsky.social ⋅ 10d
The New York Times @nytimes.com ⋅ 5d
preternia @preternia.com ⋅ 3d
Loading ...
As she’s looking slightly downward… I can only assume she’s eyeing someone’s femurs.
Not only does she look suspiciously happy, She also looks almost identical to candy from GWS. perhaps there’s something to it, maybe I’m just paranoid. Would definitely explain the attitude if they are related ^^
Cannot unsee.
Qrrrsssh.
FREEEECKLESSSSSS!
Dang! Now I got so hot looking at that and…FREEEECKLESSSSSS!
Really, I like it, specially, the FREEEECKLESSSSSS!
BTW Did I mentioned her FREEEECKLESSSSSS!
You seem to have an odd obsession with them, yes.
The cuteness, it kills!
Artist here, thanks for the kind words. I’ve been playing with my style lately, and I think I may need to work with eyebrows some, cause she does look a little too pleasant for what I was intending.
BTW, it’s actually Erika Peterson. I apparently forgot to change my last name on that email when I got married.